|
|
Highlights for 2009/10
---
---
Yearbook Predicts The Winner
You can read the East and West is coming still, but the NHLP Yearbook
has completed their synopsis on who will win the NHLP Cup Championship.
The NHLP predicts Divisions winners from the East to be Cleveland
(Tyson), Dallas (Jr), New Jersey (Jr) and Boston (Ryan) with New Jersey
and Cleveland making the finals, although not winning it all for Tyson
and Jr. The West Division winners include the Cup winner
Indianapolis (Matt), Runner up Atlanta (Ryan) as well as Los Angeles
(Andrew) and Seattle (Matt) coming out of their Divisions. The
Yearbook is right more often then wrong, like last year predicting 5 of
8 Divisions winners and 2 of 4 cup finalists. One thing wrong
throws everything out the window, as all matchups start changing in the
Semi Finals. We are fearless however, in declaring GM Matt the
2010 NHLP Champion in Indianapolis.
Representing the East in the NHLP Finals
New Jersey (Jr) CTR #7
Cleveland (Tyson) CTR #13
---
Representing the West in the NHLP Finals
Indianapolis (Matt) CTR #1
Atlanta (Ryan) CTR #10
---
Coyotes - Less Player Games Than Fans
GM Charlie is in a tight spot in the Southwest. Having four Predators
isn't all that bad, but when they play just 4 games left each, now all of a
sudden things get interesting for Chuck's Yotes. In total Charlie is down
to 28 player games, with Arnott still day to day. He is 4 points behind
Tyson, carrying injured Carter (until the playoffs) and Connolly (day to day),
but who has 35 player games, minus 13 from his injured guys. Behind
Charlie are two teams coming hard, Nashville (Marcel) and Las Vegas (Joel).
These teams are one and three points back respectively and both are healthy and
have 6 player games at hand. Each point will be crucial if Charlie is to
somehow catch Tyson or stay ahead of either one of Marcel or Joel.
The first Tie-Breaker is most goals:
Las Vegas (Joel) 119
Nashville (Marcel) 110
St Louis (Tyson) 100
Phoenix (Charlie) 99
We have never had the second Tie-Breaker put in effect because two tied teams
had the same amount of goals, which is Most GM Points before a Coin Flip would
occur.
---
Tie-Breaking Rules
Goals Scored
Most GM Points on all 4 Teams
Flip a Coin
Don't you think a better first tie-breaker might be more playoff players?
Just a thought. If it doesn't fit first, it seems a better second and
definitely a better third option. Something for us to think about for next
year for we seem to have at least a tie somewhere every single season.
---
OFFICIAL
No Penalty from San
Jose, Chicago, Phoenix, Vancouver, Colorado, Nashville, Los
Angeles, and Detroit.
No Penalty from Washington, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, New Jersey, Ottawa,
Philadelphia, Montreal and Boston.
---
Potential Penalty Charts for Eastern and Western Conferences.
Team | Games Played | Points | Games Remaining | Potential Points | If 8th Seed Plays .500 | 8th Seeds Points | Tonight 27th |
No Penalty from Washington, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, New Jersey, Ottawa, Philadelphia, Montreal, and Boston. | |||||||
Boston | 73 | 78 | 1 | 80 | 0-0-1 | 79 | Cal |
Atlanta | 74 | 76 | 1 | 78 | 1-0 | 78 | Car |
Potential Penalty from NY Rangers, Tampa Bay, Florida, Carolina, NY Islanders and Toronto and teams below the red line. |
Team | Games Played | Points | Games Remaining | Potential Points | If 8th Seed Plays .500 | 8th Seeds Points | Tonight |
No Penalty from San Jose, Chicago, Phoenix, Vancouver, Colorado, Nashville, Los Angeles, Detroit. | |||||||
Potential Penalty from Calgary, Minnesota, Dallas, St Louis, Anaheim, Columbus, Edmonton and teams below the red line. |
---
At Issue - Integrity Loophole
It has become apparent in recent years that while at the Winter and
Deadline Meetings that using the "Frozen Numbers" for the minors is not
arguably the fairest way to make these transactions. Clearly we do
not know in advance what players will and won't score the week the
numbers are frozen, so in that sense it is fair. Why is it done in
the first place? It is done so GM's have time to plan out deals
from the minors in advance of the meetings. It can also sometimes
create exciting bidding wars as GM's go after the players with the
hottest weeks. What is not fair? We are in a points scoring
league. If your player scores a point, this should never be a
negative in anyway. As with the "old way" (the way we have always
done it to date) if a player in the league had a frozen number of 40 and
had a 5 point week, these numbers are useless to the GM in a minors
deal. Where as say GM Andrew who has Campbell out for the season
at 39 points, he clearly won't get points that week but his player is
just as valuable in a dump. So in essence we are penalizing a GM
for having a big week in the middle of the stretch drive. Not
exactly fair.
Solutions? Well the BOG Rules Committee discussed and passed a new
rule they believed work and was fairer. In a way it was nothing
more than a subtle tweak that seemed to solve all the problems.
This new rule stated that when dumping players, their "up-dated" numbers
are used and when picking guys up, their frozen numbers are used.
Simple really. Seemed a perfect solution as as stated, "The way
things should have always been done."
Problem? "The minors is a necessary tool that was in the league
since the very first year" said GM Scott, "Only then we used the Toronto
Star's Tuesday list which froze points each week after games the Sunday
night. The logic with the minors is to pick up a better player, be
it a playoff guy for a non playoff, a better playoff for a playoff or a
better player. If you gained a few points, that is the way it
worked. However, this new rule is better still, but when it was
found out a team could go from 30 points out of the playoffs to in first
place by use this rule, everyone said....STOP THE FUCKING CAR."
Here is a quick example of how a GM could use the current rule, which is
totally unacceptable and will not be allowed (so it will be fixed).
Lets say Edmonton had Booth 12 points and Cole 8 and both had zero point
weeks:
Edmonton (Starting with 20 points) Drops Booth 12 and Cole 8 (20) for
PlayerA 20 (+2) and Forsberg 0 (20+2). Trade goes through
Edmonton now has 22 points (PlayerA 22 and Forsberg 0)
Edmonton now drops PlayerA 22 and Forsberg 0 (22) for PlayerB 11 (+2)
and PlayerB 11 (+2) which is 22 (+4). Trade goes through
Edmonton now has 26 points (PlayerB 13 and PlayerB 13)
Edmonton now drops PlayerB 13 and PlayerB 13 (26) for PlayerC 25 (+2)
and PlayerD 1 (+1) which is 26 (+3). Trade goes through
Edmonton now has 29 points (PlayerC 27 and PlayerD 2)
Edmonton now drops PlayerC 27 and PlayerD 2 for PlayerE 29 (+2) and
Forsberg 0 which is 29 (+2). Trade goes through
Edmonton now has 31 points (PlayerE 31 and Forsberg 0)
Edmonton could go one and on and on. This is only using two
players. Making a 3-3 or a 6-6, you can gain much quicker.
Integrity - The minors is not for this type of activity. Picking
guys like Forsberg or goalies, hell even Andrew could get picked up,
being a player-GM (although briefly). It is a mockery and will not
be allowed.
Solution - That is what we are working on. We feel we have some
obvious tweaks to the New Rule and they will be passed along shortly.
If you have a solution, feel free to send it in.
---
BOG "New Rule Needs More Thought"
The NHLP Board of Governors worked for a week going
over everything they could think of and in the end the "New Rule" just
needs more thought, "We have to go at it over the summer and go from
there" said GM Jr. What has been decided is because the rule is
flawed, it cannot be used at the meeting, meaning the rule will be the
same as it always has been and the frozen points are the numbers used in
the drop and the pick up. "We looked at many ways that would work,
such as limiting the number of minor deals each team could make or each
team would be allowed using the up dated numbers" said GM Andrew, "But
ultimately no method was unanimously agreed upon as they all had flaws."
This left no choice but to put the new rule on hold for the Deadline and
stay status quo, with the way things have been for several years.
GM Scott was not happy, "I really wish we could have agreed on something
better but before that can happen, you have to find a better solution.
For one reason or another every variation had its drawbacks. One
thing we do not like is tying a GM's hands in any way." The Rules
Committee will make this priority one in the summer and implement
something that works better, if something better is developed.
---
Minors New Rules
As a reminder there were two new rules put in place at the last meeting.
One involved players frozen in the minors and trades made to the minors.
NHLP GM's should not be penalized for players on their teams that had a
good week leading up to the meetings. This made no sense.
Now the points that go on the board when trading are simple. You
use the currently, updated stats for players you are dropping to the
minors and the frozen numbers for all players currently in the minors
being picked up. "This is the way we should have always been doing
things" said GM Jr, "It just makes sense and cuts down on a lot of work
for everyone."
"This really simplifies everything" says GM Scott, "It also stays true
to the idea that we are a scoring league and no GM should be ever
punished because his player actually had a big week. That goes
against our league's logic."
Here is just one example of how the new rule will affect the
transactions to the minors. Currently We used all numbers that
were Frozen a week earlier. We do this so GM's can prepare.
So if your player looked like this at the time of the freeze:
Sakic 30 Points
Kessel 25 Points
If you make deals to the minors, those are the numbers you'd use.
In a 2-2, you'd only have 55 points. You'd look at all the guys in
the minors and pick any two up to 55 points.
However, lets say your guys had big weeks as follows:
Sakic 30 Points + 4 Points = 34
Kessel 25 Points + 3 Points = 28
Under the currently system you could still only make a 2-2 with the
Frozen numbers, 55 points. The league punished you for having a 7
point week. Not right! Now you would have one sheet that
shows their updated numbers plus their frozen numbers and when dropping
any player, you get to use their updated numbers, even though picking up
Frozen totals.
Sakic 34 Updated - 30 Points Frozen
Kessel 28 Updated - 25 Points Frozen
So now if I do a 2-2, I'd be dropping 62 points. Now I can drop 62
for 55 and instead of an even deal, I'd be giving 7 points to the
minors.
Now if my deal goes through and those two players are now in the minors,
anyone picking them up would use their frozen numbers, on the right,
Sakic 34 Updated - 30 Points Frozen
Kessel 28 Updated - 25 Points Frozen
So anyone picking up Sakic, is 30 points in the minors and Kessel is 25
in the minors.
As always the Rules Committee will monitor how this goes and react to
all things that occur to improve on the system.
New Rule Passed at Winter Meeting
For those GM's not in attendance there was a new rule passed at the
Winter Meeting. The rule did not occur during the meeting, even
though it has came up many times over the years. The rule involves
players "Put up on the Board", heading to the minors.
The old rule would "Freeze" these players, so once a deal was put on the
board, the GM could not then take them off, better his own deal, alter it in any
way. However, many times a GM would put a player up and another GM would then
say, "I'd of given you so and so for that guy." Well, under the old system, it
was too late and if the deal goes through the player is heading to the minors.
Under the tweak to the new rule, a GM cannot take the deal off the board, better
his own deal, alter it in any way, unless another GM makes a deal with him for
one of the players he is dropping. At this time that deal would go through and
the GM who had the deal on the board could than better it, remove it or alter
it. This can only occur when a player on the board has been dealt within the
league. IMPORTANT - Just because a GM wants a guy does not mean he can
just take him for a point. The GM dropping the guy still owns the
player, that is his player, and it is his decision to make a deal for
him to another GM or not.
"The logic here" said GM Scott, "Was a deal is a deal. Does it
truly matter if it is to the minors or within the league. We'll
see it in action the first time a good player is being sent to the
minors at the deadline to make the numbers work. Other GM's will
be jumping all over this player, but the clock is now ticking so the
deals will have to be fast as this player is still on the board."
---
Upcoming WaiversTeam | Games Played | Points | Games Remaining | Potential Points | If 8th Seed Plays .500 | 8th Seeds Points | Tonight 13th |
No Potential Penalty from Washington, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, New Jersey and teams above the red line. | |||||||
Ottawa | 68 | 79 | 8 | 95 | 0-7-1 | 80 | Van |
Philadelphia | 66 | 74 | 9 | 92 | 3-6 | 80 | Chi |
Montreal | 69 | 74 | 7 | 88 | 3-4 | 80 | Bos |
Boston | 66 | 72 | 8 | 88 | 4-4 | 80 | Mtl |
NY Rangers | 68 | 69 | 7 | 83 | 5-1-1 | 80 | |
Tampa Bay | 67 | 68 | 8 | 84 | 6-2 | 80 | |
Atlanta | 67 | 66 | 8 | 82 | 7-1 | 80 | |
Florida | 66 | 64 | 8 | 82 | 8-0 | 80 | SJ |
Carolina | 67 | 64 | 8 | 82 | 8-0 | 80 | Pho |
Potential Penalty from the NY Islanders and Toronto and teams below the red line. |
Team | Games Played | Points | Games Remaining | Potential Points | If 8th Seed Plays .500 | 8th Seeds Points | Tonight 13th |
No Potential Penalty from San Jose, Chicago and teams above the red line. | |||||||
Vancouver | 67 | 85 | 8 | 101 | 0-9 | 85 | Ott |
Phoenix | 67 | 85 | 9 | 103 | 0-9 | 85 | Car |
Los Angeles | 67 | 85 | 7 | 99 | 0-7 | 85 | |
Colorado | 67 | 82 | 7 | 96 | 1-5-1 | 85 | |
Nashville | 68 | 79 | 8 | 95 | 3-5 | 85 | |
Calgary | 67 | 77 | 8 | 93 | 4-4 | 85 | |
Detroit | 67 | 76 | 8 | 92 | 4-3-1 | 85 | Buf |
St Louis | 66 | 71 | 8 | 87 | 7-1 | 85 | Clb |
Dallas | 67 | 71 | 8 | 87 | 7-1 | 85 | |
Minnesota | 65 | 70 | 8 | 86 | 7-0-1 | 85 | |
Potential Penalty from the Anaheim, Columbus, Edmonton and teams below the red line. |
---
17 Days and Counting
There are 17 days left to set your playoff teams. That is it, that is
all. After the 28th, each team will have about less then 50 player
games to play. When you factor in the GM's that won't be there, all of
a sudden things get tense in a hurry. GM's who will not be there for
certain include GM Ryan (Not travelling to the Soo on back to back
weekends) and Henry (Working a 7 AM to 7 PM shift). GM Matt has stated
his wife is due the day before, so he may not be there. That means
these guys must set their teams in advance of the deadline, remembering
that all non playoff teams in the NHL standings, not at least tied for
8th, as of the morning of Sunday, March 28th, are potential penalty
players. You are allowed to carry one such player without risk of
penalty. If you have a second such player, and this team goes on to
fail to make the playoffs, the lower point total player, 100% of his
points are deducted from your teams total before the standings are final
as of the end of the season. The good thing is you still have 17 days. The bad thing is, there
are teams likely already facing penalties no matter what they do.
The action will be hot and heavy in the coming three weeks as GM's try
and move points and non playoff players. Knowing what is in the
minors will make a huge difference. Many teams will be eating at
least one non playoff player.
---
Western Conference
Central Division
Indianapolis Icemen, GM Matt, CTR Ranking #2
You cannot be complacent in the Central Division as 3 of the top 10
ranking CTR teams (Memphis, Jr in 5th and Green Bay, Ryan in 9th) are
all hoping for big things come the playoffs. Clearly a step above
are GM Matt's Icemen, making it very clear who they are banking on in
the NHL with 4 Caps. Ovechkin, arguably the NHLP's most valuable
player, is supported by Laich, Knuble and Knuble (all Capitals) while
Burrows (Van) is potentially a great Western matchup, playing on the top
line for the Canucks. It will be difficult for the others in the
Central to stop this team come playoff time but already the whispers of
a potential '4 and out' can be heard around the league (Capitals
sweeping their weaker first round opponents), giving others the
opportunity to slay an Iceman.
Northwest Division
Seattle Storm, GM Matt, CTR Ranking #4
One of two GM's to have two top ranked CTR teams within their divisions
(Ryan in the Northeast and Southwest). GM Matt is a clear force in
the Western Conference with the 2nd and 4th overall NHLP ranked teams.
Matt's Storm are as scary as they come this season in the NHLP.
Built around the Sharks, Matt is led by who other than Thornton.
Giving him the Shark's threat would be enough with Big Joe, but Matt
also has Boyle, Pavelski and Blake, something no GM wants to match up
against in the NHLP playoffs.
Pacific Division
San Fran Titan, GM Scott, CTR Ranking #1
It is one thing to be ranked #1 in the CTR, but when your division also
has the 3rd best team (Los Angeles, Andrew) as well as a conference
featuring the top 5 overall teams, confidence isn't what you'd expect it
to be for GM Scott's Titan. Scoring isn't an issue for the Titan,
even though only running with 4 healthy players the past month, when you
have three playoff players over a point per game, something only
Memphis, JR can match (Crosby, Richards, Marleau). The Titan-Three
are Semin, Semin and Backstrom all of the Capitals. Although
pickings get slim at this point, if Clarkson (NJ) and Clarkson (NJ) can
get a month of healthy play in, the Titan could pull off a 3-3 late as
points are not an issue. Regardless if this is the playoff team or
not, they can score and if they can remain healthy, no team that plays
the Titan come NHLP playoff time will be overly joyful if the Caps are
still playing hockey.
Southwest Division
Atlanta Thrashers, GM Ryan, CTR Ranking #10
GM Ryan's second top team seems miles ahead of the competition in the
Southwest as the division features only Ryan in the top 22 overall
ranked teams. Heatley, Clowe and Setoguchi of the Sharks give Ryan
an identity and a scary one with a Sharks playoff run starting in April.
Wolski (Col) and Goligoski (Pit) add decent secondary scoring that
currently is tough for the rest of the division to catch up too.
There is plenty of room to move Vermette so Ryan should be able to add
in another big name for this years run.
(Check
out all 48 teams ranked not by overall CTR, but by Divisional Standings.
Click Here)
---
Keeping Up With The Jones
It is no secret the NHLP standings are "follow the leader", well kind of.
See, the leader in the NHLP is usually the 5th place team. The lower the
5th place team, the lower points usually in the overall division. Is this
true? Well 4 divisions have every team over 200 point, while one division,
the Southeast has yet to have even one team over 200 points. It it because
the Southeast just all drafted and traded poorly or is it because when GM's make
trades, they gage their position in correlation to the 5th place team to decide
how many points they can give?
Here is a list of the total points by division and the points of the 5th
place team as of today:
Central 1402 (223)
Northeast 1373 (220)
Gulf 1331 (216)
Southwest 1275 (203)
Pacific 1275 (202)
Atlantic 1238 (197)
Northwest 1199 (186)
Southeast 1114 (178)
Every division fell right perfectly into place. So it is fact, and always
have been fact.
More Playoff Players in Lower Scoring Divisions?
Now the next theory. Does having move points in the division mean more
or less playoff players? Well here is the next part of the theory.
Divisions that trade away their high scoring non playoff players first usually
end up with lower overall points per division, but more playoff players at the
season's end. Lets take a look at the current total of playoff guys per
division as of today, with each division having a possible 36 playoff players
and the total points for all non playoff guys in each division:
Central 1402 (223) 22 (516)
Northeast 1373 (220) 29 (217)
Gulf 1331 (216)
28 (249)
Southwest 1275 (203) 24 (351)
Pacific 1275 (202) 29 (228)
Atlantic 1238 (197) 25 (323)
Northwest 1199 (186) 23 (434)
Southeast 1114 (178) 27 (201)
The Central has 288 more points as a Division than the Southeast, but has less
playoff players and 516 points of all non playoff players, or 315 more non
playoff player points than the Southeast. The bottom four have a total of
1186 points from non playoff players, the top four, more overall points yes, but
1333 non playoff points, or 147 more non playoff points than the bottom four.
We think, although close, this theory is also fact. We also think that at
2519 non playoff points in the NHLP, a lot of movement is still upcoming.
---
For the fun of it we are taking a peak at the minors. GM Ryan asked,
"What are guys thinking?", leading to the question, "What is there to think
about?" Here is the top scoring point getter from each of today's 16
playoff teams plus other teams within 5 points or 8th.
Eastern Conference
New Jersey - Rob Niedermayer - 14 Points
Buffalo - Myers - 26 Points
Washington - Chimera - 19 Points
Pittsburgh - Cooke - 19 Points
Boston - Sturm - 22 Points
NY Rangers - Prospal - 32 Points
Ottawa - Alfredsson - 31 Points
Montreal - Bergeron - 23 Points
---
Philadelphia - Pronger - 31 Points
NY Islanders - Okposo - 30 Points
Atlanta - Antropov - 36 Points
Tampa Bay - Stamkos - 44 Points
Florida - Horton - 43 Points
Western Conference
Chicago - Brouwer - 22 Points
San Jose - Demars - 15 Points
Calgary - Dawes - 22 Points
Phoenix - Doan - 28 Points
Vancouver - Raymond - 31 Points
Colorado - Stewart - 28 Points
Nashville - Hornquist - 27 Points
Los Angeles - Stoll - 29 Points
---
Detroit - Bertuzzi - 25 Points
Dallas - Eriksson - 43 Points
---
BOG Passes New Winter Meeting/Trading Deadline
Rules
The following rule will take place during the Trading Deadline this
year. After Discussions from the Rule Committee, it was decided
this is for the betterment of the league. The Rules Committee vote
3-0 on this, GM's Andrew, Jr and Scott. "This is the way we should
have always been doing things" said GM Jr, "It just makes sense and cuts
down on a lot of work for everyone."
The new rule being implemented involves the Frozen Numbers and All
Trades To The Minors. Currently the league GM's use the Frozen
Numbers when making transactions to the minors. Under the new
rule, each GM will now have a list of players with two columns, a "Drop"
or Dropping column (Will likely be called the Updated Numbers), and a
second column of "Frozen" numbers (Also likely known as Minors or
Picking Up column). All GM's will only need this one list now
instead of multiple lists. All players in the minors, being picked
up, will use the numbers from the right had column, their Frozen
numbers. All players being sent down will use the left column,
which is the updated numbers as of the night before.
"This really simplifies everything" says GM Scott, "It also stays true
to the idea that we are a scoring league and no GM should be ever
punished because his player actually had a big week. That goes
against our league's logic."
Here is just one example of how the new rule will affect the
transactions to the minors. Currently We used all numbers that
were Frozen a week earlier. We do this so GM's can prepare.
So if your player looked like this at the time of the freeze:
Sakic 30 Points
Kessel 25 Points
If you make deals to the minors, those are the numbers you'd use.
In a 2-2, you'd only have 55 points. You'd look at all the guys in
the minors and pick any two up to 55 points.
However, lets say your guys had big weeks as follows:
Sakic 30 Points + 4 Points = 34
Kessel 25 Points + 3 Points = 28
Under the currently system you could still only make a 2-2 with the
Frozen numbers, 55 points. The league punished you for having a 7
point week. Not right! Now you would have one sheet that
shows their updated numbers plus their frozen numbers and when dropping
any player, you get to use their updated numbers, even though picking up
Frozen totals.
Sakic 34 Updated - 30 Points Frozen
Kessel 28 Updated - 25 Points Frozen
So now if I do a 2-2, I'd be dropping 62 points. Now I can drop 62
for 55 and instead of an even deal, I'd be giving 7 points to the
minors.
Now if my deal goes through and those two players are now in the minors,
anyone picking them up would use their frozen numbers, on the right,
Sakic 34 Updated - 30 Points Frozen
Kessel 28 Updated - 25 Points Frozen
So anyone picking up Sakic, is 30 points in the minors and Kessel is 25
in the minors.
As always the Rules Committee will monitor how this goes and react to
all things that occur to improve on the system.
---
New Rule Passed at Winter Meeting
For those GM's not in attendance there was a new rule passed at the
Winter Meeting. The rule did not occur during the meeting, even
though it has came up many times over the years. The rule involves
players "Put up on the Board", heading to the minors.
The old rule would "Freeze" these players, so once a deal was put on the
board, the GM could not then take them off, better his own deal, alter it in any
way. However, many times a GM would put a player up and another GM would then
say, "I'd of given you so and so for that guy." Well, under the old system, it
was too late and if the deal goes through the player is heading to the minors.
Under the tweak to the new rule, a GM cannot take the deal off the board, better
his own deal, alter it in any way, unless another GM makes a deal with him for
one of the players he is dropping. At this time that deal would go through and
the GM who had the deal on the board could than better it, remove it or alter
it. This can only occur when a player on the board has been dealt within the
league.
---
Here are the following NHLP teams that are currently facing possible
penalties, under today's NHL Standings (Current Penalty Points):
Atlantic
3rd NY Islanders (Ryan) 45 Points
4th Hartford (Andrew) 68
6th NY Rangers (Charlie) 30
Gulf
1st Florida (Marcel) 33
3rd Dallas (Jr) 2
4th Miami (Charlie) 17
Northeast
3rd Ottawa (Ray/Mike) 11
4th Toronto (Chad) 12
5th Quebec (Matt) 74
6th Montreal (Marcel) 51
Southeast
4th Cleveland (Tyson) 7
6th Cincinnati (Matt) 37
Central
2nd Memphis (Jr) 9
3rd Hamilton (Tyson) 43
4th Detroit (Henry) 74
6th Chicago (Andrew) 35
Northwest
2nd Winnipeg (Ray/Mike) 43
4th Calgary (Jr) 69
5th Alaska (Marcel) 41
Pacific
2nd Anaheim (Charlie) 39
3rd San Jose (Henry) 47
5th Portland (Chad) 38
6th San Diego (Ray/Mike) 28
Southwest
1st Las Vegas (Joel) 41
4th Nashville (Marcel) 30
6th St Louis (Tyson) 51
<=== Penalties Mentioned
If you do not understand this, read the History link for this year and
last year. It is easy. Ask if you have any questions.
Basically all it is saying is you have to make an attempt to build some
form of a playoff team. The tricky and exciting part is it changes
everyday. If Detroit gets into the playoffs, all Detroit players
are no longer penalties. If Montreal falls out, all Montreal
players are now penalties. We all play the same cat and mouse
game. It is a game of nerve, wits, skill, luck, emotions, all
mixed into one. If you hold on you can either win the lottery or
pay the price. If you give up too early, say on Philly or Detroit
who are today penalties, but tomorrow could win 5 in a row and be the
3rd seed. I only put this here as a reminder of the game we are
all in. If penalties do ever come into play at seasons end, we all
had a million opportunities to change the way we played the game, so no
complaints.
---
New Rule Passed at Winter Meeting
For those GM's not in attendance there was a new rule passed at the Winter
Meeting. The rule did not occur during the meeting, even though it has
came up many times over the years. The rule involves players "Put up on
the Board", heading to the minors.
The old rule would "Freeze" these players, so once a deal was put on the board,
the GM could not then take them off, better his own deal, alter it in any way.
However, many times a GM would put a player up and another GM would then say,
"I'd of given you so and so for that guy." Well, under the old system, it
was too late and if the deal goes through the player is heading to the minors.
Under the tweak to the new rule, a GM cannot take the deal off the board, better
his own deal, alter it in any way unless another GM makes a deal with him for
one of the players he is dropping. At this time that deal would go through
and the GM who had the deal on the board could than better it, remove it or
alter it. This can only occur then a player on the board has been dealt
within the league.
---
BOG Passes New Winter Meeting/Trading Deadline Rules
The following rule will take place during the Trading Deadline this year.
After Discussions from the Rule Committee, it was decided this is for the
betterment of the league. The Rules Committee vote 3-0 on this, GM's
Andrew, Jr and Scott. "This is the way we should have always been doing
things" said GM Jr, "It just makes sense and cuts down on a lot of work for
everyone."
The new rule being implemented involves the Frozen Numbers and All Trades To The
Minors. Currently the league GM's use the Frozen Numbers when making
transactions to the minors. Under the new rule, each GM will now have a
list of players with two columns, a "Drop" or Dropping column (Will likely be
called the Updated Numbers), and a second column of "Frozen" numbers (Also
likely known as Minors or Picking Up column). All GM's will only need this
one list now instead of multiple lists. All players in the minors, being
picked up, will use the numbers from the right had column, their Frozen numbers.
All players being sent down will use the left column, which is the updated
numbers as of the night before.
"This really simplifies everything" says GM Scott, "It also stays true to the
idea that we are a scoring league and no GM should be ever punished because his
player actually had a big week. That goes against our league's logic."
Here is just one example of how the new rule will affect the transactions to the
minors. Currently We used all numbers that were Frozen a week earlier.
We do this so GM's can prepare. So if your player looked like this at the
time of the freeze:
Sakic 30 Points
Kessel 25 Points
If you make deals to the minors, those are the numbers you'd use. In a
2-2, you'd only have 55 points. You'd look at all the guys in the minors
and pick any two up to 55 points.
However, lets say your guys had big weeks as follows:
Sakic 30 Points + 4 Points = 34
Kessel 25 Points + 3 Points = 28
Under the currently system you could still only make a 2-2 with the Frozen
numbers, 55 points. The league punished you for having a 7 point week.
Not right! Now you would have one sheet that shows their updated numbers
plus their frozen numbers and when dropping any player, you get to use their
updated numbers, even though picking up Frozen totals.
Sakic 34 Updated - 30 Points Frozen
Kessel 28 Updated - 25 Points Frozen
So no if I do a 2-2, I'd be dropping 62 points. Now I can drop 62 for 55
and instead of an even deal, I'd be giving 7 points to the minors.
Now if my deal goes through and those two players are now in the minors, anyone
picking them up would use their frozen numbers, on the right,
Sakic 34 Updated - 30 Points Frozen
Kessel 28 Updated - 25 Points Frozen
So anyone picking up Sakic, is 30 points in the minors and Kessel is 25 in the
minors.
As always the Rules Committee will monitor how this goes and react to all things
that occur to improve on the system.
---
Halfway Playoff Player Report
As all but four NHL teams have hit the halfway point in the season, and the four
who haven't, have played 40 games, it is a good time to take a look at what the
makeup of the NHLP teams are. NHLP teams need to have at least 5 playoff
players after leaving the NHLP Trading Deadline, or they may face potential
penalties at the season's conclusion.
More on that rule can be found on the History page for this season.
So, here is a look at each GM's 24 players, based on today's NHL Standings, how
many non playoff players and non playoff players total points.
GM (Total Points Ahead/Behind 4th) Total # of Non
Playoff Players (Their Points)
Scott (-14) 0 (0)
Ryan (+110) 5 (141)
Joel (+52) 5 (163)
Chad (+15) 6 (148)
Charlie (-15) 7 (175)
Henry (+74) 7 (198)
Matt (+3) 8 (168)
Mike & Ray (+12) 9 (186)
Andrew (+35) 9 (217)
Tyson (-8) 11 (168)
Jr (+88) 12 (278)
Marcel (+35) 12 (391)
Making Sense of the Numbers
Each GM can carry 4 non playoff players, one per team, if they had to later in
the season (one non playoff player per team to assure no possible penalties at
season end). What this does say is that GM's with a High (+) have general
points to give and will impact the standings when they make deals. The more
points a GM has and the less non playoff players, means this GM can give points
and playoff players. For instance GM Ryan has the most points to give at +110
and he is currently only carrying 5 non playoff players (so 19 of Ryan's 24
players are currently on NHL teams in the playoffs). GM Jr on the other hand
does have +88 points to work with, but has 12 non playoff players totaling 278
total points. GM Tyson is in a different boat, as he has 11 non playoff
players, but his overall teams are out of the playoffs which spells disaster, as
he needs to gain points but only has 13 playoff guys to trade away. Tyson
already has 168 points of non playoff players, so a lot of work is needed to
make a NHLP playoff team with 5 playoff players on each. GM Marcel does have
decent position with +35 points to work with, but with almost 400 non playoff
points and 12 non playoff players, so many deals are still going to have to be
made or his teams will never make 5 playoff players each. GM Scott doesn't
currently have a non playoff player, but he doesn't have points to give as he is
out of the playoffs. This usually either means trading playoff for playoff or
having to take on a non playoff player. It is always easier from experience to
be in a position to take a non playoff player than unload one late in the
season, which is why last place teams need to work to make a full 6 player
playoff team, knowing you can always trade for points when crunch time occurs.
There are 25 waivers left in the season, plus a Trading Deadline but teams with
non playoff players just need to be conscious of what is in the minors and what
they can possibly get within the league for their points.
---
CONGRATULATIONS NHLP ON
THREE FOUR DECADES!!!
(Thanks for the correction - it is four decades now).
As we head into 2010 the NHLP has now become a FOUR decade old league.
Starting in 1989-90 the memories run deep of the now 20 year old league.
"There is no letting up" said Muddy Capone, "As long as hockey exists
there will somehow be a league. The tradition will always live
on." Good luck to all GM's in the second half of the season as the
bragging rights are on the table for the 20th crowned winner. GM
Andrew is holding out hopes of Cup #5, while Jr hopes to repeat for the
first time since the '93-94 seasons when GM Normal became the first and
only GM to ever win in back to back years. GM Charlie has the
longest spell without a Cup, this being his 10th season of misery, but
he is hoping for and does have a shot in 2010.
---
Winter Meeting Minor's Deals
MINOR'S DEALS - Any TRADE you make to the MINORS (guys not in the NHLP
twice already), uses the FROZEN NUMBERS sent to you already, but
supplied to you there. The reason you have them already is so you
can plan ahead as to the deals you will put up on the board.
REMEMBER - If you put a deal on the board to pick up a player, you must
at least give even points. If someone lower in the overall points
standings (all our four teams add together, the Pecking Order) ties your
point total, they get their deal over yours. Whoever gives the
most points to the minors in every deal gets the deal.
TIME - Clock starts at 5 minutes for the for the first deal, then 4
minutes if someone goes over it, then finally 3 minutes each time
someone goes over the previous deal. Clock strikes zero - whoever
has the final deal on the board wins the deal.
PLAYER IN (FROM) THE PREVIOUS DEAL - Each GM to go over a deal must
include at least one player from the minors who was in the present deal
on the board. Simple when you see it all in practice.
TO PREPARE - Makes notes in advance as to the deals you will make.
Put one up whenever you desire. If someone goes over that deal,
have a counter ready where you are giving more points. Those who
aren't thinking ahead and ready to counter, usually lose the players
they are going after.
---
What Does "Minors Frozen" Mean?
The league has changed this rule over the years and
the current rules call for the NHLP freezing all player points 7 days
ahead of the Winter and Trade Deadline meetings. What this
actually means is come the meeting when deals are made for players in
the minors, the points as of games ending December 20th will be the
points used in the deal and not the actual points as of, in our Winter
Meeting case, December 27th. The logic here is that any player in
the minors who has a good week, 4 or 5 points, will now create a demand
and many GM's will bid for this player.
A new rule that is going to be presented would say that the minors will
be frozen as they are now, but when making a deal to the minors, the
actual points are used from the players currently in the league.
This raises some interesting possibilities as to the effects this would
have on trading to the minors. This way you are not penalized if
your player (deadbeat) has a good week leading into the meeting.
So all players in the minors are frozen, but if your player had 2 points
during the week, they'd count in the drop. So starting the week,
if the guy you have and the guy you want, both had the same and both
gained 2 points, you'd be dropping plus two instead of an even pick.
---
Tell the Yearbook that the CTR is seriously flawed.
Predicting playoff teams at this stage is a fools game!
Bloody Capone
Well you'd be correct in trying to predict playoff teams at this point
in the season, but for the NHLP GM's it must be done. However, the
CTR is not predicting playoff teams, it is a ranking of the current NHLP
teams based on the current NHL standings and players statistics.
If you believe the standings will change in the future, then when they
do, so will the CTR. At this very moment, consider the CTR a snap
shot, under the current standings and players point totals, the CTR is
accurate as hell. Until those things change, Sorry Marcel! - Muddy
Capone
Rule – Deductions for Non-Playoff Players
At the conclusion of the regular NHLP season and to determine NHLP playoff seeding in each division, conference and the league, NHLP teams will be penalized for points of non-playoff players. A non-playoff player will be considered a player of any NHL team, that is not on a team that is at least tied for 8th in the NHL standings (per conference) on the day of the NHLP Trade Deadline meeting and also misses the NHL playoffs (not on a 1 thru 8 seed and misses the playoffs). All players on NHL teams at least tied for 8th and higher in the NHL standings (per conference) on the day of the NHLP Trade Deadline meeting are considered playoff players regardless of their NHL teams final position in the standings. Each NHLP team will be allowed to keep the points of their highest non-playoff player. Each subsequent non-playoff player's points are deducted from the NHLP teams total points in the standings and only then the top four teams in order of remaining points after the deductions are the 1-4 playoff seeds for that division. This final point total of each NHLP team, after the deductions, will also be the points total used in determining the Semi-Finals and Finals for the purposes of seeding.
Example of actual standings from last year:As Of After Games March 21st
(FINAL)
No Penalty For Players From | Potential Penalty For Players From | |||
Boston | Detroit | Florida | St Louis | |
New Jersey | San Jose | Buffalo | Minnesota | |
Washington | Calgary | Toronto | Dallas | |
Philadelphia | Chicago | Ottawa | Anaheim | |
Pittsburgh | Vancouver | Atlanta | Los Angeles | |
Montreal | Columbus | Tampa Bay | Phoenix | |
NY Rangers | Edmonton | NY Islanders | Colorado | |
Carolina | Nashville | |||
14 points
Henry - San Jose Sharks - 2009-10
Shawn - Halifax Destroyers - 2008-09
Scott – Edmonton Oil – 2006-07
13 points
Ryan - Green Bay
Knights - 2008-09
Glen -
San Diego Griffins - 2008-09
Marcel – Florida Panthers – 2007-08
12 point night GMs
Shawn – Detroit Red Wings – 2007-08
Scott – Edmonton Oil – 2006-07
Glen – Atlantic City Gamblers – 2006-07
Shawn – New Orleans Wolverines – 2005-06
Scott – Philadelphia Flyer – 2005-06
Brady – Vancouver Canucks – 2005-06
Jr. – Calgary Flames 1999-00
Ian – Boston (His 3 Sharks had 4 point nights)
Can I Drop an Injury Player Via Waiver
Injured players are penalty free to drop at Meetings, but have penalties
when dropped via Waivers. This is the Injury Chart on the Injury
Page. You would determine the players contract and their
consecutive games missed as per games completed the night before your
waiver. Using this chart you can determine if there is a penalty.
So a player with a contract of "3" who has missed 5 consecutive games
would be a MINUS 4 in a waiver pick. So dropping that player in a
waiver means you can only pick up to 4 points less than the total for
the players you drop. Injured players dropped in waivers have
their true value (so a player with zero points is zero points and not up
to 5). You can not go negative on a player, so in this example if
your player had 3, 2, 1 or 0 points and was a MINUS 4, he is considered
a ZERO point player in the waiver drop and not a negative anything.
How Do I Pick Up?
The day after your player misses the correct amount of games you are
eligible to pick up for your player. This is your option as you
may decide to keep your player as GM Charlie will Hossa even though
Hossa will become an injury pickup at some point. When you can
pick up, you have to 6 PM that day to have an email into the league with
the player or players you are picking up. GM's pick in order or
total points on all your four teams, so sometimes you may have to send
in a second choice if more than one GM is picking on the same day.
You can only pick up players not in the league twice and who have less
points than the player you are dropping, unless your player has under 5
points to which you can pick up to 5 points.
How Many Games Does a Player Have to Miss?
Each NHLP player has a contract depending on the round they were
selected in and other factors during mid-season pickups. The
contract of a player is beside their name on the Player Tracking Page in
the "CON" column. On the injury page it shows how many consecutive
games this player must miss before he can be picked up. In short
it is as follows:
Contract 5 - 9 Games (1st Rounders)
4 - 10 Games (2nd)
3 - 11 Games (3rd)
2 - 12 Games (4th)
1 - 13 Games (5th & 6th Rounds)
Injury Rule
The NHLP has an Injury Rule for players who are injured. A player
is classified as Injured if he isn't playing for any reason. This
might be he is in the minors, suspended, healthy scratch, unsigned or
even dead! As long as the player misses the required amount of
consecutive games you he will become an injury pickup. The intent
of the Injury rule is to penalize the GM's team but not destroy any hope
they have by making them have to keep the player until the Winter
Meeting, Trading Deadline or a Waiver Pick.
Injury Page is Updated
GM's are notified when they can pick up for players, but it is good to
use the Injury page to see when your players are getting close to pick
up.
How Do Waivers Work?
A Waiver is an uncontested pick of any available players from the minors (any players not in the NHLP twice). You may make from a 1-1 to a full 6-6 but you must not pick up more points than you drop. Points are frozen for that day, so after all games the night before. So if I dropped two players totaling 25 points, I would pick up 2 players and their points would have to be 25 or less, not including any they get the night you pick them up which act like bonus points. There is more involving injured players and so other rules such as having waivers on back to back nights and such, but we'll go over those here over the next few weeks.
Waivers By Month
November - 10 Waiver Nights
December 12
January 14
February 6
March 6
Waiver Highlights
Henry has 7 waivers while Charlie has 5.
Scott, Joel, Chad and Matt only have 3 each.
Scott has the day before the March 3rd NHL Trading Deadline while GM
Henry has the day after.
After the last Waiver in March there are 32 days left on the NHL
Schedule.
Halifax First to 30 Points
Everyone knew GM Henry would have some scoring and so far, that is exactly the case. Henry's Halifax Destroyers are the first NHLP team to 30 points, with 24 just this week. There were 17 NHLP teams this week not to score 10 points, including the lowly Atlantic City Gamblers (Michael and Ray) who only had 3 points. Heatley and Kopitar have been a great 1-2 for the Destroyers as they sit atop the very high scoring North East Division where 3 teams have over 27 points.
Southeast is Tight
Early going in the NHLP races but the Southeast is really tight with all 6 teams
within 6 points from first to last. Rookie GM Tyson leads the way with
Ovechkin's 10 points in Cleveland while GM Joel is sixth in Carolina. While 6
points might separate the teams in the Division the NHLP Yearbook will be coming
out with the first NHLP CTR Rankings (Cup Threat Rankings) after the first NHL
team hits 10 games played. We'll see then if the Southeast is this tight in
quality.
Original Saying So Long
Yearbook East - Nineteen seasons after joining the NHLP, GM Glen is saying goodbye - again! Last season Glen was one of only two original members from the inaugural season of 1989-90 still in the NHLP, although Glen had stepped away for eight seasons in the middle of it all. After playing out his 11th NHLP season Glen has decided again to step away from the league. "It has been a great ride, bumpy as hell, but great" said the GM who disappointingly leaves after never winning a Championship. Glen came close in 2006-07, making the NHLP finals in Ottawa with both Niedermayer and Pronger but their three points weren’t enough as GM Chad’s Getzlaf and Heatley scored five for the Cup win. GM Glen was part of what many consider the biggest NHLP upset of all time when in 2007-08 his three man San Diego Griffins stunned GM Andrew’s Los Angeles team of six players, including Alfredsson, Spezza and Selanne. It was the first time in league history a 6 man team lost to a 3 man team, 12-9 in round one of that years playoffs. In the early years Glen was best known for the "Parties at the Dish", as his Little Rapids home would be known as. "Things like Bell Center Ice didn’t exist then" said original member GM Scott, "Glen had the old style huge Satellite Dish, like the ones NASA uses and was able to pick up hockey games other than Hockey Night in Canada. This was cutting edge stuff at the time." The NHLP had many meetings at "The Dish" over the first several season. It was at The Dish where GM Lee, sitting with a full team of Olympic players proposed those points counting in the NHLP standings, a moment that lives on in league history. GM Glen and GM Clark had some ugly battles as well, with GM Glen stating "Clark pulls more deals off the table then a waitress." It was Glen’s quick wit that will be his NHLP calling card, something that the league will not be able to replace. Glen was never at a loss for words and very out-spoken when he wanted to be. Muddy Capone said "Glen might not have always been wearing his own shoes, but no GM will ever fit someone else’s the way Glen fit the NHLP. Sadly for us all, today the NHLP lost some of it’s very sole."
The Dog - Barked Out
Yearbook East - GM Vinnie, Vinny, Vin, Viny or just Vin Dog has finally ended the speculation of his retirement, leaving the NHLP after 6 full seasons at the helm. Vin Dog went to the NHLP finals in both his first two season, narrowly losing to GM Scott in 2003, Vin’s rookie season, in a hard fought 7 game series. Although Vinnie leaves without winning the Cup he did leave a legacy. A fun guy to be around Vin was never a big trading GM, often near the bottom of the league in Transactions. "I found the league was just to time consuming" said Vinnie, "But I will miss the boys." Vinnie was often in the middle of some of the better heated battles with GM Jr. The pair seemed to have a love hate relationship and neither would ever back down when the going got rough. "Vinnie is a warrior, someone you want in your battle" said GM Scott, "I am going to really miss his poker play." The NHLP will miss Vinnie and wishes him the best in all his travels.
Shawn’s Last Transaction - Retirement
Yearbook East - If there was one thing GM Shawn loved to do - that would be to make deals! After just 5 years in the NHLP GM Shawn made his last Transaction be known and he steps aside. Muddy Capone states, "He never slept, always up late scheming and thinking, working the next deal. The Shawn’s of the world are not replaced." The league has never been hit with three GM’s leaving in the same year and the shoes will be hard to fill. Shawn loved to deal and he was setting himself up good for the years to come after a few years of giving everything he had away year after year. "Shawn would make any side bet you could think of" said GM Scott, "I am going to miss that part very much." The NHLP loses a very aggressive GM in Shawn and his transaction numbers will make a serious dent in the NHLP numbers. The NHLP wishes Shawn all the best and will always hold a spot for his return if the itch ever comes back to compete for the NHLP Championship, something he sadly leaves without winning.